Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Drag measurement on circular Cylinder report aeronautical lab 1

Tags


Abstract
In this experiment we measured the drag in a circular cylinder by direct measurement and by a wake survey method at a specific Reynold number. We took several readings using the Pitot tube to find the velocity and with certain relations we plot those with MS excel to gain the values of the drag coefficient either by the slope for the direct measurement and the area under the curve for the wake measurement.

Introduction
In fluid dynamics, drag (sometimes called air resistance, a type of friction, or fluid resistance, another type of friction or fluid friction) refers to forces acting opposite to the relative motion of any object moving with respect to a surrounding fluid. This can exist between two fluid layers (or surfaces) or a fluid and a solid surface. Unlike other resistive forces, such as dry friction, which are nearly independent of velocity, drag forces depend on velocity.
Types of drag
  • 1.       Parasite drag (skin friction drag) due to shear stress
  • 2.       Pressure drag : due to pressure distribution and normal stress (form drag)
  • 3.       Profile drag : drag due to skin friction drag and pressure drag
  • 4.       Induced drag : drag due to lift
  • 5.       Wave drag : drag due to shock waves
  • 6.       Interference drag : drag due to cross flow

In other references the skin friction drag and the pressure drag and the interference drag are called Parasite drag.
 (Found in Wikipedia)

The total drag is the combination of drag due to lift and zero lift drag which affects the velocity of the airplane for determining the gliding speed, maximum range, maximum (L/D).



Discussion
The drag coefficient measured in the direct measurements is 0.626984 which is very close to the value measured in the last experiment (Cd=0.63554)
Error = 1.3% (negligible)
The drag coefficient measured in the wake measurements is 0.05461 which is far from the value measured in the last experiment (Cd=0.63554)
Error= 91.4% (very huge)

Conclusion
The direct method is more accurate the wake measurement method and it is very close to the pressure distribution method.
The wake method is very sensitive which define the large error in addition to the human error and 
calculations.


EmoticonEmoticon